Search

Federal Parliament passes the Fairness Test Safety Net - are you caught?

Focus: Workplace Relations Amendment (A Stronger Safety Net) Act 2007
Services: Commercial
Date: 06 July 2007
Author: Workplace Relations Team
Dibbs Abbott Stillman Lawyers restructured on 1 March, 2009.
The Sydney, Brisbane and Canberra offices are now DibbsBarker.

In a week of important developments the Workplace Relations Amendment (A Stronger Safety Net) Act 2007 (“Safety Net Act”) has now been approved, increasing the duties employers now face.  In particular it requires that:
  • a Fairness Test must now be applied to all relevant collective agreements and AWAs (“workplace agreements”); and
  • an Workplace Relations Fact Sheet must be provided to all employees regarding their employee entitlements

The Fairness Test – what has it changed?

 
Before Work Choices amended the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (“WRA”) in March 2006, employers seeking to make workplace agreements had to:
  • ensure that the agreements passed a No Disadvantage Test against any relevant award before the agreements could operate.  Employers effectively had to “buy out” any applicable award conditions that they sought to remove in an agreement, by paying another, above-award benefit; and
  • have the agreements approved by an independent body such as the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (for collective agreements) and the Office of Employment Advocate (for AWAs).

After the Work Choices amendments in March 2006, workplace agreements could be substantially simpler than before, and could – and often did – remove award conditions without providing any form of compensation to the employees for doing so. 
 

The Fairness Test

 
Under the Safety Net Act of June 2007, the Workplace Authority Director (“WA”) (the new name for the OEA) must now conduct a “Fairness Test” on all relevant workplace agreements lodged after 7 May 2007 where:
  •  an employee would be entitled, but for the agreement, to a protected award condition
  •  the agreement seeks to exclude or modify a protected award condition
  •  (for AWAs) the employee is earning a gross salary of less than $75,000.
If a workplace agreement is found not to provide “fair compensation” in lieu of a protected award condition it will fail the Fairness Test and will cease to operate.   

The employee will also be entitled to compensation for the loss of the relevant award condition from the date the agreement was lodged.

To ensure the effective operation of the Fairness Test, the Safety Net also provides for penalties up to $33,000.
 

What should employers do?

The Fairness Test has introduced a significant level of complexity into the agreement-making decisions that employers now face.

Any employer which is considering entering into collective agreements or AWAs or whose workplace agreements have failed or may fail the Fairness Test should seek the advice of their Dibbs Abbott Stillman adviser to identify an appropriate, commercial solution.

If you would like more information, please contact a member of our National Workplace Relations Team listed on the right hand side of the screen.

Recent Publications
16 May 2012
A recent decision may provide businesses with an easy target when defending their brands from misuse by competitors under the Google Adwords Program in Australia.
15 May 2012
Commonwealth Compensation decisions for the week ending 4 May 2012.
10 May 2012
All banks should be aware of the impending laws relating to anti-competitive price signalling and information disclosures.
Privacy Disclaimer Contact Us Site Map CLIENT & STAFF LogIN © 2010 DIBBSBARKER