Search

Generic Pharma the winner in proposed copyright reform

Focus: New exemptions to infringement of copyright in Australia.
Services: Intellectual Property & Technology
Industry Focus: Medical & Pharmaceutical
Date: 05 April 2011
Author: Scott Sloan, Partner & Stuart Green, Associate

The recent introduction of the Therapeutic Goods Legislation Amendment (Copyright) Bill 2011 (the Bill) to the Federal Parliament seeks to amend the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) by introducing new exemptions to infringement of copyright in Australia.

Before therapeutic goods can be legally marketed and supplied in Australia, these goods face scrutiny by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA).

As part of the TGA’s review process, applicants are required to submit a Product Information document (PI) including technical information about the medicine including the characteristics of the active ingredient, its indications and contraindications, a description of clinical trials that support the indications, precautions, possible adverse reactions, dosages and storage, and other information relating to the medicine’s safe and effective use.

As a matter of public policy and as noted in the Explanatory Memorandum accompanying the Bill, “it is important for the safe and effective use of the medicine that doctors, pharmacists and other health professionals receive the same information about a medicine regardless of the brand, thus avoiding any perception that differences in the text of the PIs reflect clinical and/or pharmacological differences”.

Given the overarching policy considerations, the TGA has traditionally approved the text of a PI of a generic version of an originator medicine.  However in view of recent attempts by originator companies to assert copyright in the text of an approved PI where it is used in the PI of a generic version of the same medicine, the Australian government has deemed it necessary to introduce the exemptions.

The new section 44BA entitled ‘Acts done in relation to certain medicine’ provides that it will not be held to be copyright infringement where a person uses the text of PI “…for the purposes of applying to register a medicine, or for the purpose of varying the approved PI of a medicine, or any incidental or ancillary acts.  The exemption applies to these acts irrespective of when the PI was approved.  The exemption will also apply to third parties supplying, reproducing, publishing, communicating or adapting an approved PI for a medicine where such acts are for purposes related to the safe and effective use of the medicine”.

By closing this avenue of copyright action to originator companies, the Australian Government has removed an area of uncertainty which had the potential to impede or delay generic entry into the Australian market.
 
Scott Sloan | Partner
T +61 2 8233 9554
F +61 2 8233 9555
 
Stuart Green | Associate
T +61 2 8233 9586
F +61 2 8233 9555
The information in this document is provided for general guidance only. It is not legal advice, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional legal or other advisors. No warranty is given to the correctness of the information contained in this document, or its suitability for use by you. To the fullest extent permitted by law, no liability is accepted by DibbsBarker for any statement or opinion, or for an error or omission or for any loss or damage suffered as a result of reliance on or use by any person of any material in the document.
 
This publication is copyright. Apart from  any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, it may only be reproduced for internal business purposes, and may not otherwise be copied, adapted, amended, published, communicated or otherwise made available to third parties, in whole or in part, in any form  or by any means, without the prior written consent of DibbsBarker.
Recent Publications
22 May 2013
Australian businesses are becoming increasingly conscious that innovation is essential for our country's future prosperity. IP Australia's recently released Australian Intellectual Property Report provides some food for thought.
17 May 2013
A recent DibbsBarker article published in Proctor explains in some depth the written/mandatory final offer regimes for various personal injuries matters at the pre-proceedings stage and their interplay with the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld).
10 May 2013
Receivers and mortgagees are well-versed as to the statutory duty of sale enshrined in section 420A of the Corporations Act, but what of the duties owed by a liquidator when undertaking asset sales?
Privacy Disclaimer Contact Us Site Map CLIENT & STAFF LogIN © 2010 DIBBSBARKER