Search

Landlord and Tenant Alert: Negotiations - sorting out the issues

Focus: Relevant clauses to be considered in lease negotiations
Services: Property & Projects
Industry Focus: Property
Date: 19 July 2012
Author: Andrew Zadelis, Special Counsel

With any commercial transaction the negotiation stage is critical. Relevant issues need to be identified and agreed in principle between the parties prior to formal documentation being entered into.
 
In lease transactions, the parties (or their agents) often sign up heads of agreement outlining the intended commercial terms and any unusual legal provisions. Lengthy delays in ultimately agreeing on formal lease documents can often be avoided if attention is given in advance to the relevant issues when heads of agreement are compiled.
 
A host of issues may need to be covered off. In this Alert we focus on:
 
1.  Relocation clauses
2.  Demolition clauses
3.  Expansion clauses
4.  Contraction clauses
 
Relocation clauses
 
A relocation clause allows the landlord to move the tenant to alternative premises within the building, centre or estate.
 
Such a clause would usually be included in a lease if the landlord anticipates requiring the premises for another purpose prior to the end of the term (e.g. for redevelopment of the building or reconfiguration of the tenancy mix). Issues to be considered by the tenant include:
  • What premises will the tenant be relocated to?
  • Are the new premises in a better or worse position than the old (i.e. is there a commercial benefit attaching to one of the premises)?
  • What rent per square metre will be payable for the new premises (having regard to the commercial benefit of the new premises compared to the old)?
  • The extent and cost of the make good to be undertaken in the old premises.
  • The extent and cost of fitting out the new premises.
  • The disruption to the tenant’s business whilst moving and fitting out the new premises.
  • What compensation will be payable by the landlord?

Demolition clauses

A demolition clause allows the landlord to terminate the lease if the landlord intends to demolish the premises, usually as part of a larger demolition project.
 
Such a clause is usually included in leases where the landlord thinks an opportunity may arise during the term of the lease to develop the property and may require the demolition of the premises as a part of the proposal. Issues to be considered by the tenant include:
  • What effect will termination of the lease have on the tenant’s business?
  • What period of notice will the tenant receive or require in relation to the proposed demolition?
  • If no relocation provision is included, the need to find new premises, negotiate a new lease and fit out the new premises.
  • The disruption to the tenant’s business whilst moving.
  • What compensation will be payable by the landlord?
Expansion rights
 
Expansion rights in a lease usually allow the tenant a certain period within which to notify the landlord if it requires additional space within the building. Such a clause is usually included in leases where the tenant’s business plan predicts growth and the need for increased accommodation during the term of the lease. Such clauses will usually specify:
  • The areas of the building, centre or estate over which the tenant is to have expansion space rights;
  • The rent payable for the expansion space (usually linked to the rate payable for the currently leased space); and
  • The conditions upon which the expansion rights may be exercised.
The landlord will need to keep a careful record of all expansion rights granted by it and when they arise.
 
Contraction rights
 
As opposed to expansion rights, a contraction right in a lease usually allows the tenant a certain period within which it can notify the landlord that it wishes to surrender part of its tenancy.
 
Once again this clause benefits the tenant. It allows the tenant to reduce its rent obligations when there is a downturn in its business and its accommodation requirements are reduced. Issues to be considered by the landlord include:
  • The timing for the tenant to exercise the right, the length of notice required and the potential for the landlord to lease the space handed back; and
  • The likely leasing market conditions that might apply when the space is handed back.
Retail Leases Act
 
Where a State’s retail leases legislation applies, it will generally override any commercial agreement between the parties which conflicts with its provisions. Landlords and tenants will need to ensure that the commercial terms negotiated by them comply with the requirements of the Act where applicable.
 
These are some of the matters which need to be considered when heads of agreement are drawn up. Detailed consideration at an early stage of these topics and any consequential issues will help ensure that the parties are still smiling at the end of the transaction.
 
For more information, please contact:

Bill Burrough | Partner

T +61 2 8233 9711

F +61 2 8233 9555

E bill.burrough@dibbsbarker.com

The information in this document is provided for general guidance only. It is not legal advice, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional legal or other advisors. No warranty is given to the correctness of the information contained in this document, or its suitability for use by you. To the fullest extent permitted by law, no liability is accepted by DibbsBarker for any statement or opinion, or for an error or omission or for any loss or damage suffered as a result of reliance on or use by any person of any material in the document.
 
This publication is copyright. Apart from  any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, it may only be reproduced for internal business purposes, and may not otherwise be copied, adapted, amended, published, communicated or otherwise made available to third parties, in whole or in part, in any form  or by any means, without the prior written consent of DibbsBarker.
Recent Publications
22 May 2013
Australian businesses are becoming increasingly conscious that innovation is essential for our country's future prosperity. IP Australia's recently released Australian Intellectual Property Report provides some food for thought.
17 May 2013
A recent DibbsBarker article published in Proctor explains in some depth the written/mandatory final offer regimes for various personal injuries matters at the pre-proceedings stage and their interplay with the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld).
10 May 2013
Receivers and mortgagees are well-versed as to the statutory duty of sale enshrined in section 420A of the Corporations Act, but what of the duties owed by a liquidator when undertaking asset sales?
Privacy Disclaimer Contact Us Site Map CLIENT & STAFF LogIN © 2010 DIBBSBARKER