Search

Preservation of liquidators’ ability to make use of transcripts from examination under Corporations Act 2001

Focus: Liquidators’ ability to make use of transcripts
Services: Financial Services
Industry Focus: Financial Services
Date: 14 December 2010
Author: Richard Lyne, Senior Associate & Wendy Jacobs, Partner

In the Supreme Court of New South Wales Justice Barrett recently confirmed the generally held view that signed transcripts of public examinations under sections 596A and 596B Corporations Act 2001 are admissible against the examinee but are not admissible against third parties.
 
In Fodare Pty Ltd v Shearn [2010] NSWSC 737 Justice Barrett  considered whether the transcripts which were exhibited to an affidavit of the liquidator should be admitted. In considering the question His Honour was asked to resolve an apparent conflict between the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) and the Corporations Act 2001.
 
The defendants argued that each statement recorded in the transcript is a "previous representation" of that examinee that had been obtained for the purpose of contemplated Court proceedings. It was said that the transcripts could therefore not be used to prove the existence of any fact that it could reasonably be supposed the examinee intended to assert by the statement. Essentially they offended the rule against hearsay (section 59 Evidence Act) and did not fall within one of the exceptions set out in section 69 of the Evidence Act.

In rejecting the defendants’ argument His Honour noted that the Corporations Act (section 597(14)) expressly contemplated that signed transcripts would be admissible against the examinee, and that this would be despite any other rule of evidence.  In effect, the later Commonwealth Act prevailed over ”the general provisions with respect to hearsay contained in the New South Wales enactment".  He concluded that the transcripts could be admitted however their use was specifically confined to use "against the person" who signed the transcript and were therefore not admissible as evidence against any  third party in subsequent civil proceedings.
 
Whilst the decision will not take liquidators by surprise it is comforting to have judicial support for the standard practice of using transcripts against examinees in subsequent civil proceedings. The opposite conclusion would have severely hampered the value of this valuable weapon in the liquidator’s arsenal.
 
For further information please contact: 
 
Richard Lyne | Senior Associate
T +612 8233 9542
F +612 8233 9555
 
Wendy Jacobs | Partner
T +612 8233 9537
F +612 8233 9555

 
Recent Publications
21 May 2012
IP Australia has introduced a new online “TM Check” to assist Australian Business Name applicants identify potential impediments to use of their proposed business name.
16 May 2012
A recent decision may provide businesses with an easy target when defending their brands from misuse by competitors under the Google Adwords Program in Australia.
15 May 2012
Commonwealth Compensation decisions for the week ending 4 May 2012.
Privacy Disclaimer Contact Us Site Map CLIENT & STAFF LogIN © 2010 DIBBSBARKER